Muhammad Haque daily commentary on the state of ethics in Gordon brown’s ‘regime’
1905 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 8 December 2007
What does it say about Gordn Brown’s location in ethics when they are openly touting for Brown to appoint Tony Bliar’s main propagandist Aliarstir Campbell, as a ‘way out of the dire mess that brown finds himself in’?
Note the re-spelling of Campbell’s ‘first’ name that I have done here.
Aliar
Stir
I have done this t denote two things they are evidently looking for: they want a liar and they want Brown to get the liar to create a stir for Brown.
A lying spin the like of which has not been seen before.
For that is the phenomenal event Brown will need to ‘happen’ to get out of the mess he is in.
My advice to Brown is the same as my advice to him was 4 years ago when I first addressed him [as he held the post of the ‘prudent’ finance minister, UK] in relation to the lying Crassrail hole plot: Don’t do it! Don’t lie, ‘Gordon’!
[To be continued]
Saturday, December 8, 2007
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Muhammad Haque Commentary on the day’s corruption cover-ups in the CrossRail hole plot-flaunting media in Britain during Tuesday 27 November 2007
By©Muhammad Haque
2305 Hrs GMT London
Tuesday 27 November 2007
In a climate thick with evidence of lying and corruption linked with holders of some of the ‘highest’ offices of state in Britain today, the ‘mainstream’ media has been correctly full of stories about how David Abrahams [aka ‘David Martin’ or ‘ D Martin’] was so successful in paying so much money to the Blaired party for so long. the same media are also the supporters of the utterances by the same sort of holders of office in the CrossRail hole plot-plugging Gordon Brown administration.
We shall examine in some detail some of these links.
Back, however, to the examination of the lying dune via the tower hamlets council for the CrossRail hole plot over the past four years – that is the years of the Khoodeelaar! campaign so far...
The latest ‘mainstream media’ plug today [Tuesday 27 November 2007] for the crossrail hole-inviter ‘chief executive’ of the tower hamlets council during the khoodeelaar! Campaign against that attack [2004 to sept 2006] Christine Gilbert has been perpetrated by the guardian with the assistance of peter Wilby, the former editor of the new ss [=’new statesman and society’ which has reverted to the title ‘new statesman’ after toying with the ‘new ss’ style for a few years when the ignorant and racist Steve prat platt was its ‘editor’].
Wilby has been a typically morally challenged journo. His main claim to professionalism was at the times education supplements before he moved on. But he has not demonstrated the grasp of facts and familiarity with the reality that any decent journalist worth the description must show. And so it is with his promotion today [Tuesday 27.11.2007] of Christine Gilbert. Wilby paints a picture of Christine Gilbert that defies the weight and the warrant of the evidence. Gilbert when employed in the tower hamlets council was not at all shy of publicity.
In fact she only realised that she must not make assertions about the council’s – and thus her- achievements if she had no evidence to support those when I began to question her after a particular boast she had made in July 2003. The subject of my interrogatives in July 2003 is only marginal different from the questions that I later put to her abut her rule in brining the crossrail hole problems to the east end. Neither descriptions of my questions were ever answered by Gilbert. the following document which I wrote and published in June 2006, 3 months before she actually left the east end council, shows the breath and the significance if the questions and it as illustrates the depth of the wring that the guardian does in promoting time-serving careeristic liars. the cost to the community of the guardian’s and of the ether outlets en the 'mainstream' UK media’s promotion of lairs is higher than any sum that cud ever be calculated by the guardians’ resident control freak and Blair party propagandist, Polly Toynbee.
[to be continued]
“© Muhammad Haque / CBRUK /KHOODEELAAR / LAWMEDIA 2006
All the alleged cries in ‘sections of ‘the British press today [Friday 9 June 2006] of ‘cronyism’ at the appointment of Christine Gilbert to the Ofsted post are ritualistic. They bear no substance whatever.
None of the comments is based on any awareness of the facts of what Christine Gilbert has been upto as ‘chief executive’ in the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
I know why.
They don’to acknowledge the fact that they should know that I have been calling for Christine Gilbert’s resignation for more than a year.
I have been doing this on the Internet and locally publicly. As based on the evidence Christine Gilbert's illegitimate role in post as chief executive.
So many serious issues of concern to the people in Tower Hamlets have been jeopardised by the unsuitability of Christine Gilbert that the only course open within the legal and constitutional framework has been to make public the serious concerns that they have been. I have been forced to do that because of the rampant abuse by Christine Gilbert of the position of Chief executive.
She has defied all the standards and has become part of the corrupt clique that has caused so many problems to the integrity and the relevance to the community of the Tower Hamlets Council.
The latest call came in a KHOODEELAAR - CBRUK letter sent to her in January 2006. That letter was also published on the UK indymedia site. As is often the case with that exercise, some spelling errors were included in the published document.
Here is that letter as sent to Christine Gilbert in January 2006.
The letter contains more than enough information, evidence and analysis to put in context the fact that today I am writing to Tony Blair demanding that the appointment be cancelled as Christine Gilbert is not fit to hold any post that gives her access to power over large numbers of people’s lives.
“ In the legal communication sent earlier today [31 January 2006] to tower hamlets council chief executive Christine Gilbert, the khoodeelaar legal affairs unit tells her: "your failure to comply with your legal duties and because of your disregard for the upholding of standard on the council and because of your disappointing collusion with the illegitimate interests who now hold control on the tower hamlets council, the khoodeelaar campaign must give expression to the legitimate and democratic imperative and need and necessity to call for your immediate resignation and [in the event that you refuse or fail to resign] for your being democratically and constitutionally removed from your office as your continued holding of that position is in contravention of your legal duties and as it is jeopardising the operation of the lbth council as the democratic representer of the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets"
legal communication to Christine Gilbert on lbth council 'role' on CrossRail hole 31-1-2006
Dear Ms Gilbert
re: khoodeelaar campaign meeting 22 January 2006 – the ultimatum to the council to pass full council resolution opposing the crossrail hole, and the role so far of the controlling group on tower hamlets council
this is to confirm at 1400 hrs GMT Tuesday 31 January 2006 that
1. You, still occupying the position of chief executive in the London borough of tower hamlets council [lbth] which position you occupied on 6 October 2004 when the khoodeelaar campaign members and supporters observed the formal meeting of the lbth council cabinet that went through an agenda item on the lbth council’s role on the crossrail hole plan, have not either acknowledged or replied to or in any legally acceptable or evident way acted in acknowledgement of the demands contained in our communication to you on 23 January 2006,
2. You had written a letter to cbrukcentral in October 2004 in response to the cbruk questionnaire sent to you [and otherwise published by khoodeelaar in the local community in tower hamlets and on the worldwide web] in which the cbruk organisation stated that cllr Michael Keith, then chairing the lbth council’s regeneration committee, had misled the local community about the lbth council’s formal role and informal role in promoting the interests of the crossrail hole scheme promoters. In that letter you had questioned the cbruk central position and you also claimed that you had made notes or that you had had access to the actual notes of the meeting of 6 October 2004 and that those notes and your own recollections contradicted the cbruk central position about Michael Keith having misled the local community on the role played so far by Michael Keith himself and by the controlling group on tower hamlets council in promoting the interests of those who wanted to dig a hole in the brick lane London e1 area.
3. You failed to answer the further questions, analyses and dissection that were then put to you by khoodeelaar! and by the cbruk central committee showing you the findings of all khoodeelaar investigations into the behaviour of cllr Michael Keith upto that time in promoting the crossrail hole –pluggers’ interest and you were sent those in demonstrable accordance with the highest known and recognised standards of forensic pathology
4. You neglected to answer the questions or to deal with the evidence or to respond to the later and the newer and the more elaborate allegations the khoodeelaar campaign was making against the role you had played in allowing the violations of the constitutional duties and in tolerating or overlooking the illegalities being committed and perpetrated by sitting controlling councillors against the local community and against the local electorate and the local electorate on the matter of the crossrail hole prompters and interests
5. You have continued in the past nine days [since the khoodeelaar campaign ultimatum of 22 January 2006] to show disregard for the law, to show contempt for the legal duties and the rule of law that you ought to have been following prior to the ultimatum of 22 January 2006 and you have done all of those and you have continued to fail to conduct yourself as the impartial, law-abiding, constitution-respecting holder of the publicly-paid position of chief executive because you have been in collusion yourself against the interests of the local community that is the target of the crossrail hole attacks plan bill and that that collusion, that disrespect to the local community on your part is at odds with the statement which you published in the past 30 days after your having been included in Tony Blair’s ‘honours list’.
6. You have contradicted your own alleged affinity with the democratic rights and interest of the local community and on your alleged loyalty and your alleged respect to the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets
7. You have allowed your office to be abused again by the very interests that are threatening the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets.
8. You have according to the plans of the anti-social, anti-east end interest, pretended that you have not received our communication of 23 and 25 January 2006.
9. You have thus caused another hindrance against the community and you have also taken part in another illegitimate but gigantic corruption of the powers and the remits of the lbth council in the illegal and the corrupting misleading of and via the relevant [mainly council-funding related] elements in the local community by taking part de facto in endorsing the criminal interference with the democratic representation of the local community’s lawful and constitution demands that is contained in and symbolised by the single motion which Mr Muhammad haque put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and which was unanimously passed by that meeting.
10. Because of your failure to comply with your legal duties and because of your disregard for the upholding of standard on the council and because of your disappointing collusion with the illegitimate interests who now hold control on the tower hamlets council, the khoodeelaar campaign must give expression to the legitimate and democratic imperative and need and necessity to call for your immediate resignation and [in the event that you refuse or fail to resign] for your being democratically and constitutionally removed from your office as your continued holding of that position is in contravention of your legal duties and as it is jeopardising the operation of the lbth council as the democratic representer of the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets.
End of the legal communication to Christine Gilbert chief executive of the lbth council London E14 2BG at 1450 hrs GMT on Tuesday 31 January 2006
Earlier today Tuesday 27.11.2007, we had published the following intro: -
In the 3 years and 11 months of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign in defence of the community in the East End of London and against the takeover plot being pushed by Big Business via CrossRail, we have identified the anti-social, pro-Big Business role being played via the Tower Hamlets Council whose controlling bureaucracy has been manipulated via a cabal that has consisted of secretive individuals who have had persistently malign influence on the Council by default.
Some of these elements are paid by the City of London interests under various guises. Others are being bribed and used to betray the East End of London through a variety of corrupting ploys. All of these elements are linked with the controlling clique on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council.
On paper it is the elected council for the people of the area that is most identified as the East End of London.
In the actual use of the powers available for application by a genuinely democratic body, the controlling clique does everything to deny democracy, everything to distort the needs and the rights of the community…. Our updated and detailed questions are being published here during this evening and overnight…
Muhammad Haque Commentary on the day’s corruption cover-ups in the CrossRail hole plot-flaunting media in Britain during Tuesday 27 November 2007
By©Muhammad Haque
2310 Hrs GMT London
Tuesday 27 November 2007-11-27
In a climate thick with evidence of lying and corruption linked with holders of some of the ‘highest’ offices of state in Britain today, the ‘mainstream’ media has been correctly full of stories about how David Abrahams [aka ‘David Martin’ or ‘ D Martin’] was so successful in paying so much money to the Blaired party for so long. the same media are also the supporters of the utterances by the same sort of holders of office in the CrossRail hole plot-plugging Gordon Brown administration. we shall examine in some detail some of these links. Back, however, to the examination of the lying dune via the tower hamlets council for the CrossRail hole plot over the past four years – that is the years of the Khoodeelaar! campaign so far...
The latest ‘mainstream media’ plug today [Tuesday 27 November 2007] for the crossrail hole-inviter ‘chief executive’ of the tower hamlets council during the khoodeelaar! Campaign against that attack [2004 to sept 2006] Christine Gilbert has been perpetrated by the guardian with the assistance of peter Wilby, the former editor of the new ss [=’new statesman and society’ which has reverted to the title ‘new statesman’ after toying with the ‘new ss’ style for a few years when the ignorant and racist Steve prat platt was its ‘editor’]. Wilby has been a typically morally challenged journo. His main claim to professionalism was at the times education supplements before he moved on. But he has not demonstrated the grasp of facts and familiarity with the reality that any decent journalist worth the description must show. And so it is with his promotion today [Tuesday 27.11.2007] of Christine Gilbert. Wilby paints a picture of Christine Gilbert that defies the weight and the warrant of the evidence. Gilbert when employed in the tower hamlets council was not at all shy of publicity. In fact she only realised that she must not make assertions about the council’s – and thus her- achievements if she had no evidence to support those when I began to question her after a particular boast she had made in July 2003. The subject of my interrogatives in July 2003 is only marginal different from the questions that I later put to her abut her rule in brining the crossrail hole problems to the east end. Neither descriptions of my questions were ever answered by Gilbert. the following document which I wrote and published in June 2006, 3 months before she actually left the east end council, shows the breath and the significance if the questions and it as illustrates the depth of the wring that the guardian does in promoting time-serving careeristic liars. the cost to the community of the guardian’s and of the ether outlets en the 'mainstream' UK media’s promotion of lairs is higher than any sum that cud ever be calculated by the guardians’ resident control freak and Blair party propagandist, Polly Toynbee.
[to be continued]
“© Muhammad Haque / CBRUK /KHOODEELAAR / LAWMEDIA 2006
All the alleged cries in ‘sections of ‘the British press today [Friday 9 June 2006] of ‘cronyism’ at the appointment of Christine Gilbert to the Ofsted post are ritualistic. They bear no substance whatever.
None of the comments is based on any awareness of the facts of what Christine Gilbert has been upto as ‘chief executive’ in the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
I know why.
They don’to acknowledge the fact that they should know that I have been calling for Christine Gilbert’s resignation for more than a year.
I have been doing this on the Internet and locally publicly. As based on the evidence Christine Gilbert's illegitimate role in post as chief executive.
So many serious issues of concern to the people in Tower Hamlets have been jeopardised by the unsuitability of Christine Gilbert that the only course open within the legal and constitutional framework has been to make public the serious concerns that they have been. I have been forced to do that because of the rampant abuse by Christine Gilbert of the position of Chief executive.
She has defied all the standards and has become part of the corrupt clique that has caused so many problems to the integrity and the relevance to the community of the Tower Hamlets Council.
The latest call came in a KHOODEELAAR - CBRUK letter sent to her in January 2006. That letter was also published on the UK indymedia site. As is often the case with that exercise, some spelling errors were included in the published document.
Here is that letter as sent to Christine Gilbert in January 2006.
The letter contains more than enough information, evidence and analysis to put in context the fact that today I am writing to Tony Blair demanding that the appointment be cancelled as Christine Gilbert is not fit to hold any post that gives her access to power over large numbers of people’s lives.
“ In the legal communication sent earlier today [31 January 2006] to tower hamlets council chief executive Christine Gilbert, the khoodeelaar legal affairs unit tells her: "your failure to comply with your legal duties and because of your disregard for the upholding of standard on the council and because of your disappointing collusion with the illegitimate interests who now hold control on the tower hamlets council, the khoodeelaar campaign must give expression to the legitimate and democratic imperative and need and necessity to call for your immediate resignation and [in the event that you refuse or fail to resign] for your being democratically and constitutionally removed from your office as your continued holding of that position is in contravention of your legal duties and as it is jeopardising the operation of the lbth council as the democratic representer of the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets"
legal communication to Christine Gilbert on lbth council 'role' on CrossRail hole 31-1-2006
Dear Ms Gilbert
re: khoodeelaar campaign meeting 22 January 2006 – the ultimatum to the council to pass full council resolution opposing the crossrail hole, and the role so far of the controlling group on tower hamlets council
this is to confirm at 1400 hrs GMT Tuesday 31 January 2006 that
1. You, still occupying the position of chief executive in the London borough of tower hamlets council [lbth] which position you occupied on 6 October 2004 when the khoodeelaar campaign members and supporters observed the formal meeting of the lbth council cabinet that went through an agenda item on the lbth council’s role on the crossrail hole plan, have not either acknowledged or replied to or in any legally acceptable or evident way acted in acknowledgement of the demands contained in our communication to you on 23 January 2006,
2. You had written a letter to cbrukcentral in October 2004 in response to the cbruk questionnaire sent to you [and otherwise published by khoodeelaar in the local community in tower hamlets and on the worldwide web] in which the cbruk organisation stated that cllr Michael Keith, then chairing the lbth council’s regeneration committee, had misled the local community about the lbth council’s formal role and informal role in promoting the interests of the crossrail hole scheme promoters. In that letter you had questioned the cbruk central position and you also claimed that you had made notes or that you had had access to the actual notes of the meeting of 6 October 2004 and that those notes and your own recollections contradicted the cbruk central position about Michael Keith having misled the local community on the role played so far by Michael Keith himself and by the controlling group on tower hamlets council in promoting the interests of those who wanted to dig a hole in the brick lane London e1 area.
3. You failed to answer the further questions, analyses and dissection that were then put to you by khoodeelaar! and by the cbruk central committee showing you the findings of all khoodeelaar investigations into the behaviour of cllr Michael Keith upto that time in promoting the crossrail hole –pluggers’ interest and you were sent those in demonstrable accordance with the highest known and recognised standards of forensic pathology
4. You neglected to answer the questions or to deal with the evidence or to respond to the later and the newer and the more elaborate allegations the khoodeelaar campaign was making against the role you had played in allowing the violations of the constitutional duties and in tolerating or overlooking the illegalities being committed and perpetrated by sitting controlling councillors against the local community and against the local electorate and the local electorate on the matter of the crossrail hole prompters and interests
5. You have continued in the past nine days [since the khoodeelaar campaign ultimatum of 22 January 2006] to show disregard for the law, to show contempt for the legal duties and the rule of law that you ought to have been following prior to the ultimatum of 22 January 2006 and you have done all of those and you have continued to fail to conduct yourself as the impartial, law-abiding, constitution-respecting holder of the publicly-paid position of chief executive because you have been in collusion yourself against the interests of the local community that is the target of the crossrail hole attacks plan bill and that that collusion, that disrespect to the local community on your part is at odds with the statement which you published in the past 30 days after your having been included in Tony Blair’s ‘honours list’.
6. You have contradicted your own alleged affinity with the democratic rights and interest of the local community and on your alleged loyalty and your alleged respect to the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets
7. You have allowed your office to be abused again by the very interests that are threatening the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets.
8. You have according to the plans of the anti-social, anti-east end interest, pretended that you have not received our communication of 23 and 25 January 2006.
9. You have thus caused another hindrance against the community and you have also taken part in another illegitimate but gigantic corruption of the powers and the remits of the lbth council in the illegal and the corrupting misleading of and via the relevant [mainly council-funding related] elements in the local community by taking part de facto in endorsing the criminal interference with the democratic representation of the local community’s lawful and constitution demands that is contained in and symbolised by the single motion which Mr Muhammad haque put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and which was unanimously passed by that meeting.
10. Because of your failure to comply with your legal duties and because of your disregard for the upholding of standard on the council and because of your disappointing collusion with the illegitimate interests who now hold control on the tower hamlets council, the khoodeelaar campaign must give expression to the legitimate and democratic imperative and need and necessity to call for your immediate resignation and [in the event that you refuse or fail to resign] for your being democratically and constitutionally removed from your office as your continued holding of that position is in contravention of your legal duties and as it is jeopardising the operation of the lbth council as the democratic representer of the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets.
End of the legal communication to Christine Gilbert chief executive of the lbth council London E14 2BG at 1450 hrs GMT on Tuesday 31 January 2006
Earlier today Tuesday 27.11.2007, we had published the following intro: -
In the 3 years and 11 months of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign in defence of the community in the East End of London and against the takeover plot being pushed by Big Business via CrossRail, we have identified the anti-social, pro-Big Business role being played via the Tower Hamlets Council whose controlling bureaucracy has been manipulated via a cabal that has consisted of secretive individuals who have had persistently malign influence on the Council by default.
Some of these elements are paid by the City of London interests under various guises. Others are being bribed and used to betray the East End of London through a variety of corrupting ploys. All of these elements are linked with the controlling clique on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council.
On paper it is the elected council for the people of the area that is most identified as the East End of London.
In the actual use of the powers available for application by a genuinely democratic body, the controlling clique does everything to deny democracy, everything to distort the needs and the rights of the community…. Our updated and detailed questions are being published here during this evening and overnight…
2310 Hrs GMT London
Tuesday 27 November 2007-11-27
In a climate thick with evidence of lying and corruption linked with holders of some of the ‘highest’ offices of state in Britain today, the ‘mainstream’ media has been correctly full of stories about how David Abrahams [aka ‘David Martin’ or ‘ D Martin’] was so successful in paying so much money to the Blaired party for so long. the same media are also the supporters of the utterances by the same sort of holders of office in the CrossRail hole plot-plugging Gordon Brown administration. we shall examine in some detail some of these links. Back, however, to the examination of the lying dune via the tower hamlets council for the CrossRail hole plot over the past four years – that is the years of the Khoodeelaar! campaign so far...
The latest ‘mainstream media’ plug today [Tuesday 27 November 2007] for the crossrail hole-inviter ‘chief executive’ of the tower hamlets council during the khoodeelaar! Campaign against that attack [2004 to sept 2006] Christine Gilbert has been perpetrated by the guardian with the assistance of peter Wilby, the former editor of the new ss [=’new statesman and society’ which has reverted to the title ‘new statesman’ after toying with the ‘new ss’ style for a few years when the ignorant and racist Steve prat platt was its ‘editor’]. Wilby has been a typically morally challenged journo. His main claim to professionalism was at the times education supplements before he moved on. But he has not demonstrated the grasp of facts and familiarity with the reality that any decent journalist worth the description must show. And so it is with his promotion today [Tuesday 27.11.2007] of Christine Gilbert. Wilby paints a picture of Christine Gilbert that defies the weight and the warrant of the evidence. Gilbert when employed in the tower hamlets council was not at all shy of publicity. In fact she only realised that she must not make assertions about the council’s – and thus her- achievements if she had no evidence to support those when I began to question her after a particular boast she had made in July 2003. The subject of my interrogatives in July 2003 is only marginal different from the questions that I later put to her abut her rule in brining the crossrail hole problems to the east end. Neither descriptions of my questions were ever answered by Gilbert. the following document which I wrote and published in June 2006, 3 months before she actually left the east end council, shows the breath and the significance if the questions and it as illustrates the depth of the wring that the guardian does in promoting time-serving careeristic liars. the cost to the community of the guardian’s and of the ether outlets en the 'mainstream' UK media’s promotion of lairs is higher than any sum that cud ever be calculated by the guardians’ resident control freak and Blair party propagandist, Polly Toynbee.
[to be continued]
“© Muhammad Haque / CBRUK /KHOODEELAAR / LAWMEDIA 2006
All the alleged cries in ‘sections of ‘the British press today [Friday 9 June 2006] of ‘cronyism’ at the appointment of Christine Gilbert to the Ofsted post are ritualistic. They bear no substance whatever.
None of the comments is based on any awareness of the facts of what Christine Gilbert has been upto as ‘chief executive’ in the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
I know why.
They don’to acknowledge the fact that they should know that I have been calling for Christine Gilbert’s resignation for more than a year.
I have been doing this on the Internet and locally publicly. As based on the evidence Christine Gilbert's illegitimate role in post as chief executive.
So many serious issues of concern to the people in Tower Hamlets have been jeopardised by the unsuitability of Christine Gilbert that the only course open within the legal and constitutional framework has been to make public the serious concerns that they have been. I have been forced to do that because of the rampant abuse by Christine Gilbert of the position of Chief executive.
She has defied all the standards and has become part of the corrupt clique that has caused so many problems to the integrity and the relevance to the community of the Tower Hamlets Council.
The latest call came in a KHOODEELAAR - CBRUK letter sent to her in January 2006. That letter was also published on the UK indymedia site. As is often the case with that exercise, some spelling errors were included in the published document.
Here is that letter as sent to Christine Gilbert in January 2006.
The letter contains more than enough information, evidence and analysis to put in context the fact that today I am writing to Tony Blair demanding that the appointment be cancelled as Christine Gilbert is not fit to hold any post that gives her access to power over large numbers of people’s lives.
“ In the legal communication sent earlier today [31 January 2006] to tower hamlets council chief executive Christine Gilbert, the khoodeelaar legal affairs unit tells her: "your failure to comply with your legal duties and because of your disregard for the upholding of standard on the council and because of your disappointing collusion with the illegitimate interests who now hold control on the tower hamlets council, the khoodeelaar campaign must give expression to the legitimate and democratic imperative and need and necessity to call for your immediate resignation and [in the event that you refuse or fail to resign] for your being democratically and constitutionally removed from your office as your continued holding of that position is in contravention of your legal duties and as it is jeopardising the operation of the lbth council as the democratic representer of the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets"
legal communication to Christine Gilbert on lbth council 'role' on CrossRail hole 31-1-2006
Dear Ms Gilbert
re: khoodeelaar campaign meeting 22 January 2006 – the ultimatum to the council to pass full council resolution opposing the crossrail hole, and the role so far of the controlling group on tower hamlets council
this is to confirm at 1400 hrs GMT Tuesday 31 January 2006 that
1. You, still occupying the position of chief executive in the London borough of tower hamlets council [lbth] which position you occupied on 6 October 2004 when the khoodeelaar campaign members and supporters observed the formal meeting of the lbth council cabinet that went through an agenda item on the lbth council’s role on the crossrail hole plan, have not either acknowledged or replied to or in any legally acceptable or evident way acted in acknowledgement of the demands contained in our communication to you on 23 January 2006,
2. You had written a letter to cbrukcentral in October 2004 in response to the cbruk questionnaire sent to you [and otherwise published by khoodeelaar in the local community in tower hamlets and on the worldwide web] in which the cbruk organisation stated that cllr Michael Keith, then chairing the lbth council’s regeneration committee, had misled the local community about the lbth council’s formal role and informal role in promoting the interests of the crossrail hole scheme promoters. In that letter you had questioned the cbruk central position and you also claimed that you had made notes or that you had had access to the actual notes of the meeting of 6 October 2004 and that those notes and your own recollections contradicted the cbruk central position about Michael Keith having misled the local community on the role played so far by Michael Keith himself and by the controlling group on tower hamlets council in promoting the interests of those who wanted to dig a hole in the brick lane London e1 area.
3. You failed to answer the further questions, analyses and dissection that were then put to you by khoodeelaar! and by the cbruk central committee showing you the findings of all khoodeelaar investigations into the behaviour of cllr Michael Keith upto that time in promoting the crossrail hole –pluggers’ interest and you were sent those in demonstrable accordance with the highest known and recognised standards of forensic pathology
4. You neglected to answer the questions or to deal with the evidence or to respond to the later and the newer and the more elaborate allegations the khoodeelaar campaign was making against the role you had played in allowing the violations of the constitutional duties and in tolerating or overlooking the illegalities being committed and perpetrated by sitting controlling councillors against the local community and against the local electorate and the local electorate on the matter of the crossrail hole prompters and interests
5. You have continued in the past nine days [since the khoodeelaar campaign ultimatum of 22 January 2006] to show disregard for the law, to show contempt for the legal duties and the rule of law that you ought to have been following prior to the ultimatum of 22 January 2006 and you have done all of those and you have continued to fail to conduct yourself as the impartial, law-abiding, constitution-respecting holder of the publicly-paid position of chief executive because you have been in collusion yourself against the interests of the local community that is the target of the crossrail hole attacks plan bill and that that collusion, that disrespect to the local community on your part is at odds with the statement which you published in the past 30 days after your having been included in Tony Blair’s ‘honours list’.
6. You have contradicted your own alleged affinity with the democratic rights and interest of the local community and on your alleged loyalty and your alleged respect to the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets
7. You have allowed your office to be abused again by the very interests that are threatening the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets.
8. You have according to the plans of the anti-social, anti-east end interest, pretended that you have not received our communication of 23 and 25 January 2006.
9. You have thus caused another hindrance against the community and you have also taken part in another illegitimate but gigantic corruption of the powers and the remits of the lbth council in the illegal and the corrupting misleading of and via the relevant [mainly council-funding related] elements in the local community by taking part de facto in endorsing the criminal interference with the democratic representation of the local community’s lawful and constitution demands that is contained in and symbolised by the single motion which Mr Muhammad haque put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and which was unanimously passed by that meeting.
10. Because of your failure to comply with your legal duties and because of your disregard for the upholding of standard on the council and because of your disappointing collusion with the illegitimate interests who now hold control on the tower hamlets council, the khoodeelaar campaign must give expression to the legitimate and democratic imperative and need and necessity to call for your immediate resignation and [in the event that you refuse or fail to resign] for your being democratically and constitutionally removed from your office as your continued holding of that position is in contravention of your legal duties and as it is jeopardising the operation of the lbth council as the democratic representer of the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets.
End of the legal communication to Christine Gilbert chief executive of the lbth council London E14 2BG at 1450 hrs GMT on Tuesday 31 January 2006
Earlier today Tuesday 27.11.2007, we had published the following intro: -
In the 3 years and 11 months of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign in defence of the community in the East End of London and against the takeover plot being pushed by Big Business via CrossRail, we have identified the anti-social, pro-Big Business role being played via the Tower Hamlets Council whose controlling bureaucracy has been manipulated via a cabal that has consisted of secretive individuals who have had persistently malign influence on the Council by default.
Some of these elements are paid by the City of London interests under various guises. Others are being bribed and used to betray the East End of London through a variety of corrupting ploys. All of these elements are linked with the controlling clique on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council.
On paper it is the elected council for the people of the area that is most identified as the East End of London.
In the actual use of the powers available for application by a genuinely democratic body, the controlling clique does everything to deny democracy, everything to distort the needs and the rights of the community…. Our updated and detailed questions are being published here during this evening and overnight…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
